トランスメディア提供アイコン01 カテゴリ:News-HK( 10 )

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 有區議會委任議員,有民建聯,香港冇運行

再續”Officers, are you really working?”

剛才在一則有關香港政府要動用區議會把香港市民的公共空間出賣給地產業主的新聞中討論。其中一個網友回應,時代廣場大電視的聲浪大到震耳程度,而且都是在為地產商在公眾空間用聲浪賺取廣告收益。我又想返起D政府和區議會D岸9野。

話說我遇過一班退休阿伯,D音樂樂器玩得出神入化,得閒在公園JAM音樂消遣,一D都唔嘈,雖然個公園好靜,但只要行開兩步,五米以外已經聽唔清楚佢地的音樂了。但玩左一個鐘,就見D公園實KILL來趕人。公園告示話不能騷擾別人,但有沒有定下什麼才是騷規則?五米?二十米?二十分貝?給公眾一個規則等人去守,有D世藝搞下會死嗎?一刀切禁止,公園乜都唔讓D公公和後生的做,只准路過,咁就叫管理?乜都唔使做了,使鬼花稅金請你來管?D財團地產商就在公眾地方嘈到隔離幾座樓D人都得,D弱勢社群就小心翼翼都不能在公園跟三五同好娛樂,搞搞街頭文娛,給呢個政府同D區議員趕絕。

D建制派區議員經常說人們可以到其他沒人的地方搞街頭表現,但實際上香港有邊度可以?他們經常說他們不知,但只要不要在他們當區議員的地方,結果全香港所有有區議員的區都不可以!即是全港都不可以!痴線!!

成日話讓一個人在某區做街頭藝術,就會有三百三千三萬個人來某條街某公園出現表演。呢D低能的政棍,死左對香港有利,呢D人邊有能力治區,治港?我想說,什麼時候香港街頭的足球場籃球場乒乓球枱會有幾百幾千人爆場玩的?從來不會。為什麼?人太多時D人見到會走,選過第二個場,又或者第二個時間玩嘛!江湖規矩,先到先得,永遠不會出現爆場的。呢D先至係社會常識Y嘛。

我地D委任和民建聯D區議員係乜野外星人來咖,咁簡單的社會常識都冇,竟然嚇D市民會有三千三萬人來阻街,呢D一個二個都係葉劉靈魂附體,七到冇朋友。

給一個公園或是一條街,任由D市民在一定的規定下進行街頭表演,在外國是可以形成一個旅遊業賣點來咖。而且也是一個文化發展的搖籃地。香港政府一天到晚說要發展旅遊業,又話要起西九發展本土藝術,講Q咁多,佢地識乜?你開一個偏遠一點的公園又好,開一條街又好,咁咪又有旅遊點,又有藝術發展囉。定好一條規則,不准超過一定分貝,有規有矩,市民又有得HAPPY。三萬人會來逼爆場?誰再說就叫他去麥花臣球場罰企一星期,在那裡學一些社會常識啦,了解民間實情。在香港,斷唔會藝術家多過波友吧。呢個政府,都係乜都唔識做。乜野常識都沒有。那些民建聯的區議員,跟那些委任議員,跟私人業主法團糾纏不清,利益互相輸送,一日到黑只懂勾結有錢人,欺負小市民。
[PR]

by windywood | 2008-08-29 16:27 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 香港不需要「被英雄」人物

在旺角嘉禾大厦大火中殉職的兩名消防員,今天被政府追頒最高的金英勇勳章。無論怎麼說,這兩名消防員真的很偉大,可是,我們香港不需要這樣的英雄。

今次的五級火災,有很多地方都跟十二年前的嘉利大厦五級火災有相同之處。同樣是大厦低層的娛樂場所莽顧大厦內的人命安全沒有安裝好防火和防煙設備。一個慘痛的教訓之後,當時政府說詞人手不足,改善要慢慢來,怎料一慢就用了超過十年時間來立法,然後到了去年還要設立了什麼幾年的寬限期給業主慢慢來。事情還不只這樣,一位消防員曾在大火後打電話到電台的節目,告訴主持人政府內部還有一個長達六年的寬容期,每一個違規個案要經過六年消防署才可以依條例採取正式行動,但很多那些大業主都會在六年期滿之前把物業出手,所有消防隊在六年內的工作變成「白做」,又要對新業主由第一年的程序開始做起。現在,政府這樣「得到業主和商戶達成共識」的施政,還要犠牲多少生命,製造多少「英雄」後,才算是對業主和商人寬容得足夠?這些寬容,十多年來的寬容已被證實是建立在消耗人命上了。

另一方面,這次事件也揭露了香港消防隊的裝備超過十年沒有更新,追不上世界標準。消防員是用他們的生命在火場為市民搏命的,試問這些裝備錢政府怎可以慳,不讓消防員在得到最安全的器材支援下上陣的?香港政府是不是已窮到要他們在這種裝備的支援下拼命?請問政府還準備好了多少英勇勲章,頒給那些因為這個政府「善財難捨」而製造出來的英雄?

這兩位消防員不是單純地因為他們的英勇而離世。他們是因為特區政府對自己的寬容,對商家財主的寬容,才會成了「被英雄」人物。他們雖然偉大,可是我情願他們不用「被英雄」,而繼續留在他們的家人身邊,留在他們的同事身邊,活蹦亂跳地作普通的活人。
[PR]

by windywood | 2008-08-29 16:03 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 Officers, are you really working?

In the last two weeks, I had two very upset experience.

On Sunday two weeks ago, that was a very sunny day. I was attracted by sunshine and decided to have lunch outdoor and met a group of old men playing music in a park. They played very good music, I swear, and they played quietly. They tried not to annoy anyone in the park. I was sitting less than 50m away from them to have my burger, but I almost couldn't hear what they played.

So I changed my seat to get closer to them. But still not clear enough. I got closer and closer to them, and finally just next to them. I borrowed their instrument and played music with them. That is a joy hour. However, only about an hour.

More
[PR]

by windywood | 2008-07-30 23:16 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 下雹了!

In this summer, it was falling hail again in Hong Kong.

It was in the afternoon of almost 34 degree C on July 27. This is the fourth straight year of this natural phenomenon happened in Hong Kong. Moreover, the same thing happened in Shanghi and in another town of the same province as Shanghi this year, too.

Is this phenomenon really that natural?
[PR]

by windywood | 2008-07-30 22:51 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 Officers, are you really working?

In the last two weeks, I had two very upset experience.

On Sunday two weeks ago, that was a very sunny day. I was attracted by sunshine and decided to have lunch outdoor and met a group of old men playing music in a park. They played very good music, I swear, and they played quietly. They tried not to annoy anyone in the park. I was sitting less than 50m away from them to have my burger, but I almost couldn't hear what they played.

So I changed my seat to get closer to them. But still not clear enough. I got closer and closer to them, and finally just next to them. I borrowed their instrument and played music with them. That is a joy hour. However, only about an hour.


That is a public park. Someone phoned to a park manager to complain those old men, then a park officer showed up stopping the activity. This is what commonly happens in Hong Kong. People are not allowed to have any kind of creating or art activity on the public area. Otherwise, the police finally come up to expel you. At many tourist area photographers are not allow to use tripod. In parks or on streets, even you are a world announced artist, you still can't stop down to stretch or paint picture at a side of the road. I have never heard the same things happened in other city or country.

Actually, if the government want to keep the order, they just outline a regulation to let people follow, and citizens can still enjoy creation and performance in the public area. However, the government just SWAP it all, like the same way they handle the cases of bird-flu and non-smoking campaign in restaurants. NO ART ACTIVITY ON PUBLIC AREA THEN THEY DON'T NEED TO REGULATE PEOPLE. NO LIVING CHICKEN IN HONG KONG THEN THEY DON'T NEED TO REGULATE FARMS AND SHOPS. NO SMOKER IN RESTAURANTS THEN THEY DON'T NEED REGULATE SMOKERS AND RESTAURANTS. Then they can sit back and sleep and get paid.

The government is saying to spend huge amount of money to build an art center in West Kowloon in order to courage the development of art and cultural industry in Hong Kong. Everyone knows that is only a trick to mock the citizens to fill the Victoria Harbor to create land for housing business giants. Officers in Hong Kong government don't know what the art is and they don't care. When they want art, they buy a air-ticket to have vacation oversea. This is their understanding of art. Pathetic.

But I have a question. What the government officers is just swap all the activity required regulation to make no regulation necessary, then their job is as easy as sitting on a chair; my question is, they have got no job to perform, why do they still get our tax-payers' money to sit in the office?

Another story happened two days ago. When I finished taking photos of hawkers on the street, an old lady came to me. She asked me if I am a journalist, and begged my grace not to put their activities on newspaper.

I felt sweat in my eyes. There showed two folds of problems in Hong Kong government. Although Hong Kong shouldn't be a poor city, the welfare for old people is totally the third world's, and somewhat insulting to the olds! Many old people live miserably in Hong Kong. The government officers always say that there are loopholes in present welfare policies to be abused so they can't raise the amount of budget on elder welfare. However every time when someone cried out a welfare reform, they just go get deaf ears.

This is the main reason why I dropped the plan of receiving Herceptin because I worry about my mom's living after I pass away if I use up her savings.

Hawker activities in Hong Kong used to be very characteristic. It was one of burning factors of tourist industry in Hong Kong. Furthermore, it was the way that thousands and thousands of poor family made their living in the past. However, the government just swap them all. Of course, it is because they hate all regulation. You can cry, you can commit suicide, but you can't be a hawker. There is only one option of regulation plan about hawker business - NO PLAN IS NEEDED BECAUSE OF NO HAWKER.

The same question: They make their job not even exist, why keep their position with our money?
[PR]

by windywood | 2008-07-30 15:51 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 下雹了!

In this summer, it was falling hail again in Hong Kong.

It was in the afternoon of almost 34 degree C on July 27. This is the fourth straight year of this natural phenomenon happened in Hong Kong. Moreover, the same thing happened in Shanghi and in another town of the same province as Shanghi this year, too.

Is this phenomenon really that natural?
[PR]

by windywood | 2008-07-30 15:46 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 混淆視聽的陷阱~愛他們成了害他們~

中文學生報那件事,今天矛頭由討論學生是否有錯,轉到批評大學的處理方法上。

那麼學生的事呢? 去了哪里呢? 他們搞情色版是他們自願還是學校要求的呢?大學有要求他們以這種方式編輯情色版的內容?

難道大學在事後的處理手法的對錯,可以令這群學生的責任一筆勾消?

我怕,這樣把大學的處理手法和學生編輯的事混淆在一起,只會鼓勵那群學生把自己責任推卸,永遠不去反省,不能從這件事中成長。那些弄出這混淆局面的人,本來是為了同情孩子,結果最後只會妨害了他們的成長。

為什麼現在的孩子到了大學了,還是像小學生般對社會要求一無所知?還不是在這種家長和社會的混淆視聽的環境下長大的後果?

現在孩子在小學、中學犯錯時,不少家長都是為孩子想盡辯護的理由,或指責對方的小孩刺激了他的小孩,或指責老師的管教傷害了孩子的心理,結果他們的孩子在判斷力和責任感方面,由小到大都沒有在正確的引導下成長過。孩子永遠沒有學習過如何勇敢地面對過失,在反省中學者自強自重。

支持學生的家長們和校友們,你們真的用對了方法去愛那些孩子嗎?
[PR]

by windywood | 2007-05-13 22:22 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 好像小學生的大學生

今晚跟家人一起談中文學生報那些學生編輯們,所反駁社會批評的說話,
實在除了無奈之外,就只能當作笑話看。

中文學生報40年來一直辦得很好,對社會有貢獻,但那40年的歷史是由他們創造的嗎?
前人做很好是他們的功勞?

"如果傳媒不報導學生報的這起事件,中文大學的聲譽就不會被毀。"
我想問問這班學生報編輯,他們是辦報的?
報紙傳媒不是要報導真相,維護公眾知情權,
使政府和機構受到公眾的監察麼?
他們開口埋口就說他們編審自由,
一方面就自相矛盾地否定其他傳媒的新聞自由?

新聞自由在這群小子眼中根本一文不值,
他們只是把新聞自由當作是快歺店的外賣塑膠盒子,方便自己,用完隨手即棄。

自己做錯了事,就指責別人把真相公開。
這麼不分是非的是大學生? 是小學生吧。
更何況中文大學今次的校譽不就是敗在他們手上嗎?

這幾年,我看著現在的家長教育小孩是多麼的放縱。
政府為了硬銷教育改革,
惡意抺黑學校教師的,拉攏家長不相信教師,消除改革的阻力。
家長面對老師有如狼虎,老師對學生稍加管教就如履薄冰,但仍不免遭到投訴。
多年來政府和家長那些任性莾為,終於在今天開花結果了。善哉,善哉。
[PR]

by windywood | 2007-05-12 23:26 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 How many cigarettes do you smoke daily?

For those in Hong Kong, the answer is 8.

No kidding. This is what I found in the latest issue of Time magazine yesterday. The air pollution in Hong Kong is so bad. Living in Hong Kong for one day, the amount of pollutant inhaled equals to that of smoking 8 cigarettes.

So what do I think?

I think we've got a good reason to have more BBQ in Hong Kong. Having BBQ for one time is equivalent of having 1 cigarette daily for 1 year. When we are having 8 cigarettes every day, we should get a couple more to enjoy our life.

Furthermore, it is quite a natural disaster for a country with 14 billion people to develop without regulations and respect to public interests.

你每天吸多少支煙?

如果你活在香港的話, 答案是8。

沒有開玩笑, 這是我昨晚在「時代」雜誌看到的。香港的空氣汚染程度,已到達大家只要在這裡住一天就吸了相等於8支香煙的汚染物。

那麼我有甚麼感想?

首先我們可以更放心多去燒烤。在一次燒烤中才吸了一年中每日一支煙的汚染物,反正已吸了8支了,多幾支又何妨,而且是以這麼快樂的方式。

而且也看到了在一個有14億人口的國家在沒有有效的管制和人民缺乏公德的意識下以西方模式發展經濟,所帶來可怕的自然災難。
[PR]

by windywood | 2005-01-12 20:19 | News-HK

トランスメディア提供アイコン01 記念黃霑 - So Long, James Wong

又一位伴我成長的香港文化的蓋世英才離去。
顧家輝一句:「我也想為黃霑作曲,但由誰來填詞?」後不見有來者,令人神傷...

One more giant in Hong Kong Hall of Fame passed away today.
[PR]

by windywood | 2004-11-24 13:52 | News-HK